<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PsychNet Reviews and Recommendations &#187; browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psychlinks.net/tag/browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psychlinks.net</link>
	<description>Reviews and recommended products, resources, software, books, and services, with occasional commentary on SEO, SEM, technology, and the internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.psychlinks.net/internet-explorer-firefox-and-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psychlinks.net/internet-explorer-firefox-and-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>djbaxter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers and Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychlinks.net/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve seen several articles recently proclaiming loudly that Google&#8217;s Chrome browser has taken over the number three spot from Safari (e.g., Google Chrome is Now the No. 3 Browser &#124; Search Engine Journal).
One would think this were a huge accomplishment from all the excitement. But in reality, beating out Safari, the Apple browser, is a [...]<p><a href="http://www.psychlinks.net/internet-explorer-firefox-and-google-chrome/">Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Google Chrome</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.psychlinks.net">PsychNet Reviews and Recommendations</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-child "></p><p><span title="I" class="cap"><span>I</span></span>&#8217;ve seen several articles recently proclaiming loudly that Google&#8217;s Chrome browser has taken over the number three spot from Safari (e.g., <a target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outgoing/http_www_searchenginejournal_com_google_chrome_is_now_the_no_3_browser_15913_');" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-chrome-is-now-the-no-3-browser/15913/" target="_blank">Google Chrome is Now the No. 3 Browser | Search Engine Journal</a>).</p>
<p>One would think this were a huge accomplishment from all the excitement. But in reality, beating out Safari, the Apple browser, is a small accomplishment, given that it has never had more than 5% market share, especially since this follows the recent release of the Apple version of Google Chrome.</p>
<p>Here is the way the statistics stack up currently, according to <a target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outgoing/http_marketshare_hitslink_com_browser_market_share_aspx');" href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx" target="_blank"><em>Net Applications</em>’ web browser usage data for December</a>:</p>
<table style="width: 385px; height: 168px;">
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="text-align: left;">Browser</th>
<th>Percent of Market</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;">Microsoft Internet Explorer</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">62.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Firefox</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">24.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Google Chrome</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Apple Safari</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Opera</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Opera Mini (mobile browser)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">0.63%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- table generated by StG's vB Code [table "0" not found /]<br />
 v.0.1.7.1 (stable) o.31 --><br />
After all the furious negative publicity over the past 5 years, Internet Explorer still has two-thirds of the market, although that is a slip from 80-90% before Firefox was introduced. Meanwhile, Firefox has risen to approximately one quarter of the market.</p>
<p>So what this all boils down to is that Google Chrome now has about a thundering third of the one-eighth market share left over after Internet Explorer and Firefox have taken their cuts.</p>
<p>That wouldn&#8217;t seem to me to be a reason for breaking out the champagne just yet.</p>
<p>Discussion continues at  <a target="_blank" href="http://forum.psychlinks.ca/computers-technology-and-the-internet/21364-browser-wars.html">http://forum.psychlinks.ca/computers-technology-and-the-internet/21364-browser-wars.html</a>.</p>
<p><em><strong>&#8230;.</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Addendum</strong><br />
</em> Now, from <em>Computerworld</em> via <em>PC World</em> comes this:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/185743/windows_loses_market_share_to_mobile_operating_systems.html" target="_blank"><em>Windows Loses Market Share to Mobile Operating Systems</em></a><em><br />
</em></strong><em>by<strong> </strong>Gregg Keizer, Computerworld<br />
Jan 3, 2010</em></p>
<p><em>Microsoft&#8217;s Windows resumed its usual losing form in December as the operating system&#8217;s usage share dropped by about a third of a point even as </em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/173967/windows_7_a_complete_survival_guide.html?tk=rel_news" target="_blank"><em>the new Windows 7</em></a><em> posted a second straight month of impressive gains, Web metrics firm Net Applications said Friday.</em></p>
<p><em>Although rival desktop operating systems &#8212; Mac and </em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/topic/122/Linux+and+Unix" target="_blank"><em>Linux</em></a><em> &#8212; essentially remained flat, mobile OSes, including </em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9136345/Google_Update" target="_blank"><em>Google</em></a><em>&#8216;s Android and </em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137163/Apple_Update" target="_blank"><em>Apple</em></a><em>&#8216;s iPhone OS, took up the slack created by Windows&#8217; dip. Mobile operating systems, said Net Applications, now power 1.3% of all the hardware that surfs the Internet.</em></p>
<p><em>Windows finished the year with a 92.2% share, down 0.3 of a percentage point. It was the eighth month in 2009 during which Windows lost share.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>So more people are using mobile operating systems. And Microsoft Windows has &#8220;fallen&#8221; to a lowly <strong>92.2%</strong> share of all operating systems when mobile OSs are included.</p>
<p>Does anyone seriously believe that having a 92.2% market share is going to worry Microsoft or its shareholders?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.psychlinks.net/internet-explorer-firefox-and-google-chrome/">Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Google Chrome</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.psychlinks.net">PsychNet Reviews and Recommendations</a></p>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://www.psychlinks.net">PsychNet Reviews and Recommendations</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psychlinks.net/internet-explorer-firefox-and-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

